Home / 
2009 (9) TMI 730
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ri V. Raja Ram, JDR, for the Respondent. ORDER Vide the impugned Order-in-Revision, the Commissioner denied the benefit of cum-tax value to the appellants which had been allowed by the original authority. Accordingly, he demanded an amount of Rs. 52,789/- in excess of the demand of Rs. 3,81,154/- and applicable interest confirmed by the original authority and paid by the appellants. As per t....
TaxTMI