Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2009 (5) TMI 811

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ue filed this appeal against Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was set aside. 2. After hearing both sides and on perusal of the records, it is seen that the respondents had provided service of Commercial or Industrial Construction. Tax was demanded for the period from 2005 to 2007 vide Show Cause Notice dated 6-9-2007. O....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... under Section 78 of the Act is imposable. Therefore, Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the demand of duty for the extended period and dropped the penalty under Section 78, is contradictory. So, the matter is required to be examined on the facts. It appears from the impugned order that the respondents have neither replied to the Show Cause Notice, nor attended personal hearing before the original auth....