Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (5) TMI 773

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....anufacture of M.S. Bars chargeable to Central Excise Duty under 7214 99 90 of the Central Excise Tariff. On 10-1-06, the jurisdictional Central Excise Officers in the course of patrolling in the industrial area intercepted a Tractor-Trolly No. RJ21-R-8729 on Road No. 9F VKI Area, Jaipur loaded with M.S. Bars. On enquiry with the tractor driver Shri Kan Singh, he produced only a Dharm Kanta receipt showing the weight of the goods loaded on the trolly as 1520 kgs. and other than this Dharm Kanta receipt, there was no other document like Central Excise invoice etc. covering the goods. However, on enquiry, the driver of the tractor told the officers that the goods had been loaded from the factory premises of the appellant and that after weighme....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....S. Bars seized from the tractor trolly with option to redeem on payment of duty applicable and the redemption fine in lieu of confiscation of Rs. 7500/-, (b) ordered confiscation of the tractor trolly with option to redeem on fine of Rs. 15,000/-, (c) confirmed duty demand of Rs. 78,923/- against the appellant along with interest in respect of finished goods found short and (d) imposed penalty of Rs. 78,923/- on the appellant under Section 11AC. On appeal against this order, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Dy. Commissioner's order. It is against this order of the Commissioner (Appeals), the present appeal has been filed. 2. Heard both sides. 2.1. Shri Atul Gupta, Co. Secretary, ld. Counsel for the appellant pleaded that t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e seized goods along with tractor trolly is not sustainable. 2.2 Shri S.K. Bhaskar, ld. DR defended the impugned order and pleaded that the goods being manufactured by the appellant are evasion price commodity in respect of which the duty evasion is very common; that the explanation given by the Director of the appellant's company is not satisfactory; that the driver of the tractor trolly Shri Kan Singh in his statement given on the spot at factory stated that he had been instructed by the company to deliver the goods to the premises of M/s. Raj Minerals & Allied Products, Road No. 9F. VKI Area, Jaipur; that the tractor trolly has also been intercepted from Road No. 9F which corroborates the driver Shri Kan Singh's statement that the ....