Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (5) TMI 752

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant. Shri S.N. Srivastava, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.K. Das, Member (J)]. -  The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Pipes and Tubes classifiable under Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1984. On 25-9-2001, the Central Excise Officers visited the appellants' factory and conducted stock verification. Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enhanced penalty to Rs. 2,18,274/- (i.e. equal amount of duty). Hence, the appellants filed this appeal. 2. Ld. Advocate submits that the shortage was detected during stock verification and the appellants voluntarily deposited the duty on the shortage. He further submits that the appellants' factory was started during 2001 and due to lack of knowledge, they have cleared the branded goods u....