Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2009 (3) TMI 847

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. 39,10,79,512/-, the original authority confirmed the proposals. The Commissioner (Appeals) reduced the demand to Rs. 35,32,83,006/- while upholding the order of the original authority otherwise. Vide Final Order No. 628/01 dated 4-5-2001 the Tribunal remanded the matter for de novo decision on the grounds that the assessment was provisional and therefore the demand of differential duty was improper; the expert opinion given by BHEL could not be ignored in the absence of another equally respectable opinion. The impugned order was passed following remand direction of the Tribunal as per the final order mentioned above. 2. An expert opinion was obtained by the Department from the Technical Adviser (Boilers), Ministry of Commerce and I....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as normally transported in several consignments. This was the industry practice owing to the physical feasibility. However the supply was against order for a full boiler and no components in excess of what could constitute a boiler was cleared and transported. Accordingly, he held that the impugned clearances involved boiler in unassembled condition classifiable under CSH 8402.10 and dropped the demand the proposal to   Rs. 39,10,79,512/-. 3. The Revenue is in appeal against the above order. The following grounds are taken in the appeal. Boilers emerged only at site on assembly, erection etc. along with components received from other units of BHEL, imports and those sourced through vendors of BHEL. A functional boiler could ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n filed by BHEL, the respondent relied on, inter alia, the decision of the Tribunal in CCE, Pune v. Thermax Bobcock & Wilcox Ltd. [2005 (182) E.L.T. 336 (Tri.-Mumbai)] and CCE, Coimbatore v. Servall Engineering Industries [2004 (168) E.L.T. 125 (Tri.-Chennai)] and the HSN notes. 5. We have carefully considered the facts of the case and the rival submissions. On a perusal of the expert opinion obtained by the Department from the Technical Adviser (Boilers) of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, a boiler came into existence on manufacture, erection of : (i)      Drum (ii)    Fittings like: Feed pipe and steam pipe Economiser; Super heater and Re-heater (iii)   Mounting like valv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sified in their own appropriate heading." The above note is an authority to classify a complete machine or a machine which has acquired the essential characteristics of a machine under the heading appropriate to the complete machine when cleared in unassembled form in different consignments for convenience of transportation. We find that the Commissioner has decided the classification of the impugned goods as a boiler of CSH 8402.10 in accordance with the statutory provisions. 6. We also find that in the Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Ltd. (supra) case which dealt with an identical dispute, the Tribunal held as follows : "But we still hold that this variance in opinions expressed, does not alter the fact that the parts of boilers as clear....