Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (3) TMI 847

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hem and to demand differential duty of Rs. 39,10,79,512/-, the original authority confirmed the proposals. The Commissioner (Appeals) reduced the demand to Rs. 35,32,83,006/- while upholding the order of the original authority otherwise. Vide Final Order No. 628/01 dated 4-5-2001 the Tribunal remanded the matter for de novo decision on the grounds that the assessment was provisional and therefore the demand of differential duty was improper; the expert opinion given by BHEL could not be ignored in the absence of another equally respectable opinion. The impugned order was passed following remand direction of the Tribunal as per the final order mentioned above. 2. An expert opinion was obtained by the Department from the Technical Adv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onnes, which could not be transported in one lorry and was normally transported in several consignments. This was the industry practice owing to the physical feasibility. However the supply was against order for a full boiler and no components in excess of what could constitute a boiler was cleared and transported. Accordingly, he held that the impugned clearances involved boiler in unassembled condition classifiable under CSH 8402.10 and dropped the demand the proposal to   Rs. 39,10,79,512/-. 3. The Revenue is in appeal against the above order. The following grounds are taken in the appeal. Boilers emerged only at site on assembly, erection etc. along with components received from other units of BHEL, imports and those s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s at the time of clearance. 4. In the cross-objection filed by BHEL, the respondent relied on, inter alia, the decision of the Tribunal in CCE, Pune v. Thermax Bobcock & Wilcox Ltd. [2005 (182) E.L.T. 336 (Tri.-Mumbai)] and CCE, Coimbatore v. Servall Engineering Industries [2004 (168) E.L.T. 125 (Tri.-Chennai)] and the HSN notes. 5. We have carefully considered the facts of the case and the rival submissions. On a perusal of the expert opinion obtained by the Department from the Technical Adviser (Boilers) of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, a boiler came into existence on manufacture, erection of : (i)      Drum (ii)    Fittings like: Feed pipe and steam pipe Economi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... incomplete machine having the characteristics of a complete machine, are classified in their own appropriate heading." The above note is an authority to classify a complete machine or a machine which has acquired the essential characteristics of a machine under the heading appropriate to the complete machine when cleared in unassembled form in different consignments for convenience of transportation. We find that the Commissioner has decided the classification of the impugned goods as a boiler of CSH 8402.10 in accordance with the statutory provisions. 6. We also find that in the Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Ltd. (supra) case which dealt with an identical dispute, the Tribunal held as follows : "But we still hold that this varian....