2009 (3) TMI 713
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Appellant. Shri Kishori Lal, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : A.K. Srivastava, Member (T)]. - The following, in a tabular form, are the demands of duty, penalties imposed under the various provisions of law by the Commissioner vide the impugned order, and the amounts paid by the appellants herein i.e., M/s. Subham Polymers Ltd. and M/s. Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd. M/s. SUBHAM POLYMERS LT....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 20,000/- Rule 209 2. 50,000/- Rule 209 3. 2,500/- Rule 209 Total Nil 72,500/- Manawat Plastic has deposited Rs. 10,000/- as per order of CEGAT. 2. The learned Consultant, who was representing both the appellants, has contended that the appellants are not contesting the duty and are willing to pay the same. He stated that out of the duty amount of Rs. 2,52,553/-, the appellants h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....have also been imposed under Section 11AC. He also prayed for reduction of penalties imposed only under Rule 173Q. He also prayed for leniency with regard to the penalties imposed on M/s. Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd. under Rule 209. 4. The learned SDR reiterated the findings of the Commissioner and prayed for confirmation of the penalties imposed on the appellants by the Commissioner. 5.&emsp....