Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (2) TMI 555

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondent. [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - This stay petition is filed for waiver of pre-deposit of the duty amount of Rs. 10,23,034/-, interest under Rule 57-I(3) read with Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and penalty of Rs. 50,000/- under Rule 173Q of the Act. 2. Heard both the sides and perused the Records. After hearing the stay application for some ti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sion that since the unit of 'West Bengal is not in existence, the applicant should have deposited the amount by cash and dismissed the appeal without going into merits. It is the submission of the appellant that since the amount has already been deposited through RG 23A Part II, the stay may be granted and the matter be remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for the disposal, on merits. 4. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appeals), LTPU, Bangalore has taken the appeal for the disposal in respect of dues of the company's unit in West Bengal. If so, since the amount has been debited by M/s. ABB Ltd., we are of the view that insisting upon them for pre-deposit the amount by cash will not serve any purpose and will be retrogative. Accordingly we find that the deposit made by the appellants through RG 23A, Part-II kept ....