Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (8) TMI 707

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are that the Respondents are engaged in the manufacture of M.S. Pipes classifiable under Chapter 73 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On 8-12-2001, the Central Excise Officers visited the Respondent's factory and conducted stock verification. The said officers found shortage of s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble High Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana v. Omkar Steel Tubes (P) Ltd. - 2008 (221) E.L.T. 200 (P & H) and Commissioner of Central Excise v. Electrolus Kelvinator Ltd. reported in 2006 (206) E.L.T. 1137 (P & H) = 2008 (11) S.T.R. 216 (P & H). 4. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of the records, it is seen that on ....