Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (10) TMI 536

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fication of mistake is filed by the revenue against the Order No. A/1168/WZB/Ah'bad/07, dated 11-5-2007 [2009 (233) E.L.T. 105 (T)]. 2. Learned DR submits that the mistake apparent on the face of the record is as under: "It is therefore submitted that the Hon'ble CESTAT order No. A/1168/WZB/Ah'bad/07, dated 11-5-2007 is not proper and legal as the Hon'ble CESTAT has not given any findings o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stake against the said order of Hon'ble Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad No. A/1168/WZB/Ah'bad/07, dated 11-5-2007." 3. Learned DR relies on the decision of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Parle International Ltd. v. UOI - 2001 (127) E.L.T. 329 (Guj.). 4. None appears on behalf of the respondent despite notice. 5. Considered the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt herein cannot be considered as duty and the findings arrived at by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) (reproduced above) are correct, and does not require any interference." It can be noticed from the above reproduced order of the Tribunal it is held that having not challenged the said order of setting aside the demand, the amount which was deposited by the respondent cannot be considered as d....