2008 (7) TMI 699

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Katiyar, JDR, for the Appellant. Ms. Anagha Gavende, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - This appeal filed by the Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. RJB/M-III/12/2003, dated 31-1-2003. 2. Considered the submissions made by both sides and perused the records. 3. The contention of the ld. JDR is that the Commissioner (Appeals) has set....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is seen that the penalty has been imposed on the respondent under Section 11AC of CEA 1944. Ld. Commissioner (Appeals)'s findings while setting aside the penalty are reproduced below :- "It is also to be seen whether the party had any motive to evade duty. The machine was cleared for captive consumption, the final product was dutiable. Modvat credit was legally available to them. Under such cir....