Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (6) TMI 473

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. -  Heard both sides. 2. The appellants filed this appeal against the impugned order whereby refund of Rs. 4,12,376/- was disallowed on the ground that incidence of duty has been passed on. 3. The appellants filed this refund claim in pursuance of the order passed by the Tribunal whereby enhancement of value of impor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... say that when the goods were sold at loss burden of duty has not been passed on. 5. Contention of the Revenue is that as per provisions of Section 28D of the Customs Act, every person who has paid the duty on any goods under this Act shall, unless the contrary is proved by him, be deemed to have passed on the full incidence of such duty to the buyer of such goods. Contention of the Revenu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp;We find that in this case refund filed by the appellants was rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. During the arguments a specific question was asked by the Bench, whether the appellants were showing in books of account the amount in dispute as recoverable from the Customs. Answer to this query was that the appellants were showing consolidated amount recoverable from the Customs. Content....