2008 (7) TMI 676

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri Ravi Raghvan, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - Revenue came in appeal being aggrieved by the first Appellate order, which relied on HSN classification and granted relief to respondent while the order of the original authority held that the goods in question shall be classifiable under Heading 3307.90. Grievance of the appellant all along was that the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....duct in question is only perfume and how the buyer uses such goods is immaterial for the seller. Reasoning for proper classification was given by the learned Appellate authority to hold that the goods shall be classifiable under S.H. 33.03 and that is proper. Therefore, the first appellate order which is more reasoned does not call for any interference. 4. Heard both sides and perused reco....