2008 (8) TMI 611

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i J.A. Khan, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. 2. Dr. Samir Chakraborty, learned Advocate appearing for the Appellants states that this Appeal was earlier dismissed in the absence of clearance from the Committee of Disputes to pursue this Appeal before the Tribunal, vide Order dated 20-3-2007. He states that in the meantime, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e tune of Rs. 2.97 crores (Rupees two crores ninety-seven lakhs) has been made in this case on the assumption that there is a difference between the figures of production and quantity mentioned in Annual Statistics of the Appellant public sector steel plant and those reported in excise returns in respect of the production of billets, blooms, slabs and ingots. Dr. Chakraborty also submits that ther....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d as the learned J.C.D.R. who is required to argue this case is not present today. 4. After hearing both sides, we reject the request for adjournment. In view of the fact that the High Power Committee on Disputes in which the Department of Revenue was represented, has allowed the Appellant to pursue this Appeal before the Tribunal, we recall the earlier Order of Dismissal dated 20-3-2007, wh....