Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (7) TMI 544

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ember (J)]. - This appeal of the Revenue is against the Commissioner's decision to drop the department's proposal for imposing penalty on the respondents under Section 114A of the Customs Act. The hearing notice issued to the respondents has returned with the postal remark "left". 2. After examining the records and hearing ld. SDR, we note that the offence alleged against the respondents, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant, for invoking this penal provision in respect of an offence committed prior to 28-9-96, it would be enough if the SCN and subsequent proceedings are taken after the said date. This argument requires to be rejected at once. The import in question had taken place, admittedly, prior to 28-9-96. The appellant is not able to say for certain as to when the respondents committed the offence punishabl....