Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2007 (12) TMI 350

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dent. [Order]. - The appellant filed this appeal against the rejection of the remission application under Rule 21 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. Learned Counsel on behalf of the appellant submits that the appellant filed the remission application for remission of duty on natural/handling loss. He submits that the Commissioner observed that handling loss is not either natural or unavoidable. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unavoidable. She observed that handling loss is not come within the ambit of Rule 21 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal in the case of J.K. Sugar Ltd. (supra) held that handling loss is covered under Rule 21 of the Rules. The relevant portion of the said decision is reproduced below :- "5. It is to be noted that proviso to Rule 49 specifically covered both storage and handling losse....