Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2007 (11) TMI 505

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cture of dutiable commodities Ordinary Denatured Spirit and exempted commodity Rectified Spirit classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 2204.00 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant availed Cenvat credit on molasses used in the manufacture of dutiable and exempted finished goods. The appellant reversed the credit on molasses used in the manufacture of exempted final product under Rule 6(3)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. But the appellant did not reverse the credit on inputs used in the manufacture of exempted final product, which was lost as mentioned in ER-1 return. Show cause notice was issued proposing demand of duty on this ground. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of duty of Rs. 87,4....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dit taken on molasses used in the manufacture of exempted final product, under Rule 6(3) (b) of Cenvat Credit Rules. On scrutiny of the monthly return, it was noticed by the Central Excise Officers that during the period May, 2002 to December, 2002, there is persistent loss of exempted goods i.e. Rectified Spirit and the appellant had neither reversed the credit taken on input molasses nor paid any amount of duty. Therefore, it was proposed in the show cause notice that the appellant are liable to reverse back the full credit on molasses attributable to the manufacture of exempted final product, which were lost. The contention of the appellant is that the exempted final product Rectified Spirit was used in the manufacture of dutiable final ....