Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2007 (11) TMI 504

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mehta, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order per : M. Veeraiyan, Member (T)].  - These two appeals are by the Department against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) No. RKS/124-125/VALSAD/2003 dated 19-8-2003. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are as follows :- (a)     The respondent are engaged in the manufacture of casting, capping ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Notification No. 5/98 and paid the normal rate of duty (stated to be 24%) and also availed Cenvat credit. (d)    The assessee has cleared goods valued at Rs. 4,09,84,896/- after completion of Rs. 100 lakhs during the period from 1-9-1999 to 29-2-2000. (e)     The Original Authority held that the assessee has violated the conditions of the Notification No. 5/98 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e financial year and accordingly he supports the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). 6.1  We have carefully considered the submissions from both sides. The Notification No. 5/98 does not contain any condition that if they opt to avail the benefit of Notification No. 5/98, they should continue to avail the same during the entire financial year. However, Original Authority after holding that ....