Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (1) TMI 1214

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The total demand created was Rs. 2,72,65,238 which included interest of Rs. 61,70,149 under section 234B of the Income-tax Act. The assessee paid a total sum of Rs. 98,76,636 against the above demand and the balance outstanding is Rs. 1,73,88,602 which includes interest of Rs. 61,70,149. The Learned AR for the assessee argued that while making TP adjustments the assessee had applied Resale Price Method (RPM) to determine the arm's length price and on this basis no adjustment was required. The TPO however though he held that RPM was the most appropriate method observed that the assessee had used expected gross profit margin while computing its gross margin which was nothing but a notional figure. He therefore adopted Transactional net margin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessee had not filed the financial accounts of the comparable cases as was clear from letter dated 20-10-2010 of the Addl.Commissioner (TP) written to the Assessing Officer a copy of which has been placed on record. As regards the research and development expenses, it was submitted that the Assessing Officer in para 3.6 of the order had given a clear finding that the nature of the business of the assessee was processing and marketing of vegetable seeds and the assessee was neither producing nor developing any kind of seeds and therefore expenditure did not relate to the business of the assessee. It was accordingly urged that the stay petition of the assessee should be rejected. 3. We have perused the records and considered the rival co....