Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (2) TMI 531

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. [Order]. - Heard both the sides. The appellants filed this appeal against the impugned order whereby credit of Rs. 50,000/- was disallowed and penalty of Rs. 1,000/- was imposed. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Branded Chewing Tobacco and they are having two units. The appellants were receiving the duty paid inputs in the main u....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gistered with the Revenue as two units of manufacturers for the manufacture of branded chewing tobacco. The first unit is availing the credit in respect of the inputs and the some of the inputs were transferred to the other unit for manufacture of intermediate product i.e. colour tobacco and the whole of the intermediate product was received in the second unit. The contention is that Commissioner ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... had suppressed the material facts, is sustainable. 5. The contention of revenue is that the appellants had cleared the inputs from one unit to another unit without following the procedure, therefore, the demand is rightly made. 6. In this case, the undisputed facts are that the appellant is the manufacturer of branded chewing tobacco and having two units in the same factory. In one un....