Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2006 (8) TMI 502

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. -  Vide Order-in-Original dated 28-1-99 the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed the demand of duty of Rs. 2,63,49,261.65. However the demand of Rs. 1,62,20,468.15 was dropped by him. In respect of confirmed demand of duty, the appellants filed a declaration before the designated authority for settlement of the dues....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s appeal as not maintainable. Hence, the present appeal by the Revenue. 3. After hearing both sides, we find that in terms of the provisions of Section 92 of the Finance Act, 1998, the appellate authority is not to proceed in certain cases, where the issue relating to the disputed chargeable expenditure, etc. had been settled under Section 90 by the designated authority. However, proviso to ....