TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2007 (4) TMI 453
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the records and hearing both sides, I am of the view that the appeal itself requires to be finally disposed of at this stage. Accordingly, after dispensing with pre-deposit, I proceed to dispose of the appeal. 2. The original authority had imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,000/- on Sri Adesh Kumar, proprietor of M/s. Ankur Offset & Packaging under Section 112 of the Customs Act. Against this penal....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....received by the addressee on the next date. It is submitted that it was without considering this application that learned Commissioner (Appeals) proceeded to dismiss the appeal on the aforesaid ground. It is pointed out that the appellate authority noted in the impugned order that no reply had been received from the appellant as of date to the interim direction for pre-deposit. It is submitted tha....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ven for pre-deposit expired only on 25-3-2006. Thus it appears that, before the expiry of the time allowed for pre-deposit, the party's response in the form of modification application was available on record. Learned Commissioner (Appeals) ought to have considered the said application on merits before proceeding to dispose of the appeal. It also appears that, before passing the order, any opportu....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sed restrictions on disposal of imported goods. It appears from the records that the goods were imported by one party and sold to another and that the appellant procured it from the latter. The party between importer and the appellant, viz. M/s. Madhu Offset Printers, Hyderabad, has not been penalized. On these facts, I have found prima facie case for the appellant against the penalty imposed on t....