2007 (1) TMI 366

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cate, for the Appellant. Smt. R. Bhagya Devi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - After examining the records and hearing both sides, we are of the view that the appeal itself requires to be finally disposed of at this stage. Accordingly, after dismissing the present applications, we proceed to deal with the appeal. 2. The appellants had imported a "H....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n 13-7-2005. The order of that authority was subsequently reviewed by the Commissioner under Section 129D(2) of the Customs Act and accordingly, an appeal was preferred with the Commissioner (Appeals). Ld. appellate Commissioner allowed that appeal. Hence the present appeal of the assessee. 3. It is submitted by learned Senior Advocate for the appellants that the appropriate remedy in law ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gs of the department to recover the amount from the party could only be on the ground of 'erroneous refund'. Erroneous refund is a specific ground laid down under Section 28(1) of the Customs Act for recovery from an assessee any amount of duty refunded already to them. On the facts of the present case, it was only this provision of law which provided a remedy to the department and nothing else. S....