Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (1) TMI 312

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....akh, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : M. Veeraiyan, Member (T)]. - This is an appeal by the department against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) No. ZBN/365/M-VII/2000 dated 19-12-2000. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The relevant facts, in brief, are as follows : a. The respondent who are manufacturers of various chemicals cleared Diethyl Sulphate Sludge (DES Sludge) and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....am in agreement with the appellants and hold that the DES Sludge is beyond the purview of "manufacture" and hence levy of duty is uncalled for." 4. The learned DR submits that spent sulphuric acid emerging as a by-product is liable to duty as held in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad v. Keti Chemicals, 1999 (113) E.L.T. 689 (Trib.- LB). 5. The learned advocate for the ....