Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (6) TMI 515

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., DR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Duty of Rs. 95,822/- has been confirmed against the appellant by denying them the Modvat credit on the ground that they had sent 1996.295 Metric tons of Modvatable raw material to their job worker for manufacture of inserts and have received back only 1796.666 Metric tons of inserts from their job worker. Revenue's contention is that as per the  reco....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... has not brought on record any evidence to show that the burning loss at the job worker end was less than 10%. Tribunal in the case of West Metals Caps Ltd. v. CC. Ahmedabad reported in 2004 (170) E.L.T. 451 (T) = 2004 (64) R.L.T. 831 (CESTAT-Mum) has held that mere claim of higher burning loss does not lead to inevitable conclusion of clandestine removal. The circular No. 267/136/87-CX.8, dated 1....