Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (10) TMI 300

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Respondent. [Order]. -  Heard the learned JDR. The respondents are called absent. The Revenue is in appeal aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise & Customs, Aurangabad where in he has set aside the penalty of Rs. 1,000/- (one thousand) imposed under Section 11AC since the duty has been paid in full much in advance before issuance of show caus....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....goods and raw materials. It appears that the assessee had accepted the difference in the stock position of the CTD bars and melting scrap and paid the duty. The contention of the assessee is that the shortage in CTD bars was due to accumulated weight difference over a period of time. The adjudicating authority found fault on this aspect and treated this/suppression of fact hence imposed penalty of....