Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (6) TMI 261

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e 1957. In certain earlier assessment years, disputes arose between the assessee-company and the Central Excise department regarding the rate at which excise duty was payable on assessee's product. The assessee, on the basis of show-cause-cum-demand notices issued to it by the Central Excise department, claimed deductions of the disputed demands in its computations of income for the purpose of income-tax. The appellant's claims for such deductions were allowed in the respective assessment years. Such deductions aggregated to Rs. 1,71,35,268 till 31-3-1980. The said dispute between the assessee-company and the Central Excise department was finally decided in assessee's favour by the Supreme Court during the previous year ended 31-3-1996; i.e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... reopening of the assessment under section 147. The second ground is regarding the computation of business profit for the purpose of section 80HHC inasmuch as whether the sum of Rs. 1,71,35,268 has to be excluded or not. 5. We heard Shri Arvind Sonde, the learned counsel appearing for the assessee. The learned counsel submitted that the assessee is not pressing the first ground regarding the validity of the reopening of assessment. 6. Regarding the second ground, the learned counsel submitted that the lower authorities have erred to hold that the assessment of central excise liability under section 41(1) could not be treated as profit of the business of the assessee for the purpose of section 80HHC. He contended that profits of the busine....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ied on by the assessee-company during the relevant previous year, not to speak of any export activities. The learned departmental representative further submitted that the claim of the assessee is further hit by Explanation ( ba) to section 80HHC(4C) whereby the receipts in the nature of section 41(1) have to be excluded to the extent of 90% in computing the business profits for the purpose of section 80HHC. 8. We considered the matter in detail. The "profits of the business" means the profit and gains computed under the provisions of sections 28 to 43C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 41(1), comes therefore, among the provisions relating to the computation of business profits/gains. Section 41(1) provides for treating the assessment (....