Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (5) TMI 227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant. Shri H.C. Verma, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - The appellants are a manufacturer of tractors which are liable to duty on the basis of their value. They sold the tractors to dealers and adopted their sale price to the dealers as assessable value for discharging Central Excise duty. 2. Subsequently, two show cause notices were issued to t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....venue's contention that dealers were being given commission. The basic evidence relied upon by the Commissioner is Circular dated 17-10-96 of the appellant. 4. We have perused record and heard both sides. The contentious Circular may be extracted: "                       &n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r margin while reselling the tractors. This Circular, to our mind, gives no room for a finding that the appellants' buyers are commissioning agents and not dealers. Or that the appellant is giving any commission to its first buyers. Evidently, the transaction between the appellant manufacturer and the first buyers are outright sales on principal to principal basis. Section 4 of the Central Excise ....