2006 (3) TMI 377
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Appellant. Shri Amit Singh, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.K. Abichandani, President]. - In this case the appeal has been preferred against the final finding to the extent that it has been held that imports had been made from the subject countries below their normal value. Admittedly, in the final findings no duty was recommended since it was held that the dome....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....aterial injury made in these proceedings which led to non-imposition of any anti-dumping duty, will have no relevance in any future proceedings as apprehended by the learned Counsel for the appellant, because those proceedings, if at all undertaken under the provisions of Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, will be in respect of a different period of investigation for which fresh determina....


TaxTMI