2005 (12) TMI 409
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....kani, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Ajay Saxena, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - Shri V.S. Nankani, ld. Advocate for the appellants mentions that against an order of this Bench Nos. S/275,276/WZB/05, CI/M/299/WZB/05 C.I., dtd. 13-12-05, the Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai has moved the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition (LOD) No. 3054 of 2005.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sioner of Customs (Import) Mumbai addressed to Jt. Chief Departmental Representative to the following effect :- "Sub :- (1) Filing of Writ Petition in the High Court, Bombay. (2) Engagement of Special Counsel to represent the Department before CESTAT, Mumbai. (3) Application for adjournment of the hearing of the appeal posted for 22-12-2005 in the matter of M/s. Hyundai Heavy Industires C....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ery high to the tune of Rs. 21 crores. The proposal for engaging Special Counsel in the prescribed proforma has already been forwarded to the Member (L & J), C.B.E.C., New Delhi. You are requested to inform the Hon'ble Tribunal that the engagement of Special Counsel may take sometime and request to seek appropriate adjournment in view of the Writ Petition filed before the High Court, Bombay ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s they have obtained an order seeking a decision in this matter today and a day previous to the implementation of the order. They had instructed the ld. D.R. to seek an adjournment. Since an adjournment has been sought by the Revenue and the appellants are ready to proceed with the case, we would reluctantly adjourn the matter to a suitable date. The ld. D.R. was instructed by the letter of Commis....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI