Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI OCR ✕

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2005 (12) TMI 405

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri B.L. Meena, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - The lower authorities demanded duty of Rs. 7,42,531/- from the assessee for the period Nov. 97 to Mar. '98, denying them the benefit of Rule 57F(3) the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that their claim under Rule 57F(3) has not been properly considered by the authorities....

PrevPreviousNextNext