2005 (12) TMI 405

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri B.L. Meena, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - The lower authorities demanded duty of Rs. 7,42,531/- from the assessee for the period Nov. 97 to Mar. '98, denying them the benefit of Rule 57F(3) the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that their claim under Rule 57F(3) has not been properly considered by the authorities....