2005 (12) TMI 404

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....karan, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri S.S. Bhagat, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. In view of the fact that the appeal filed by M/s. Shree Venkatesh Steel Ltd. is on a different issue, the same is separated from the group of appeals heard together and is dealt in this order. 2. Shri T. Gunasekaran, learned Advocate ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Compounded Levy Scheme. He further states that in the appellants' case since the production is predominantly of the non-notified goods, they are required to pay only normal duty under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and not under Section 3A. The learned Counsel also states that in fact they have paid a higher amount of duty Rs. 1,84,14,286/- through P.L.A. which is more than the amount....