2005 (3) TMI 663

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. [Order]. -  This is a Revenue appeal against the OIA No. 273/2003-C.E., dated 22-8-2003. The Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the Registration Certificate has been issued to the same assessee carrying on manufacture in two different premises. Therefore, the capital goods installed in the main unit is required to be considered for grant of Modvat credit. He has rejected the Revenue's ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....evenue is accepting the fact that the assessees have two units and capital goods were installed in one of the units. He further points out that the Mahazar was drawn in the year 1997 and the Show Cause Notice was issued in 1999 and hence, the demands are barred by time. He points out to the Apex Court judgment rendered in the case of CCE, Chandigarh-II v. Bhalla Enterprises - 2004 (173) E.L.T. 225....