2005 (4) TMI 336

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate, for the Respondent. [Order per : K.C. Mamgain, Member (T) (Oral)]. - Both these appeals filed by the Revenue arise from the same impugned order-in-appeal and are taken up for decision by this common order. Brief facts of the case are that the respondents are manufacturing terry towelling cloth in running length having dividing thread to demarcate the individual towel. The goods are assesse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espondents and imposed penalties. On appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), the Commissioner (Appeals) gave a finding that once duty has been assessed under Heading 63.02, even if any further process such as bleaching, dyeing, or cutting to size and stitching does not change the classification of the product and therefore, no further duty can be charged on the respondents. 2. Shri C. Mani....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... dividing threads was bought by the respondents and it was duty paid after being classified under Heading 63.02. Therefore, any process which has been undertaken subsequent to that does not change the classification of the product and no further duty can be charged on the same. He relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Madras v. Binny Ltd. (B & C) Mills reported in 2003 (158) E....