Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (4) TMI 329

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Narasimhan, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri Randhir Singh, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. -  These are two applications for waiver of pre-deposit of Central Excise duty as under :- Name of the Party Duty M/s. Kaycee Electricals Rs. 4,98,84,151/- M/s. Vimla Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. Rs. 1,64,71,606/- 2. Shri A.R. Madhav Rao,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g the process not amounting to manufacture; that this is evident from the fact that subsequently the Central Government has issued a Notification No. 3/91 (N.T.) under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act. He relied upon the decision in the case of Chloride India Ltd. v. CCE, 1994 (72) E.L.T. 435 wherein it has been held that where there is a doubt in the nature or in the mind of the department i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the thickness of the wire bar or wire rods in the said matter. In view of these facts there is no prima facie case for applying ratio of the said decision in the present matters. However, the learned Advocate has made out a strong prima facie case on the ground of non-invocability of the extended period of limitation for demanding the duty. We, therefore, direct the Applicant No. 1 to deposit a s....