Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (2) TMI 606

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....anager, for the Respondent. [Order per : Moheb Ali M., Member (T)]. -  This application for stay arose out of the order of Commissioner (Appeals). In the impugned order the Commissioner modified the order of the lower authority who held that excess duty was paid and therefore refundable, but credited the amount to Consumer Welfare Fund on the ground that the incidence of duty had been passe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al Excise invoices and the said commercial invoices indicated composite prices. The composite price at the factory gate and that charged from the depot is the same. Therefore the conclusion drawn by the Commissioner that in the case of composite sales price charged by the assessee from his depot, the incidence of duty was not passed on to the customers is not correct. 4. Heard both sides. 5....