Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (10) TMI 445

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Shri O.P. Arora, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. -  Under the impugned order, the duty demand is on two counts. A demand of about Rs. 54 Lakhs is on the ground that the appellant has not entered their production fully and correctly inasmuch as there is variation between quantities indicated in the BIS Register and RG-I Register. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... contention of the learned Counsel that, in a case where quantity of production entered in the Excise record is much higher than the tested quantity entered in the BIS register, there could be no allegation of short entering production with intention to evade duty. The learned Counsel also pointed out that, according to the Panchnama itself, the appellant's record of raw material is in order. The ....