2004 (10) TMI 373

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Respondent. [Order (Oral)]. -  After examining the records and hearing both sides, I am of the view that the appeal itself requires to be finally disposed of. Accordingly, after dispensing with pre-deposit, I take up the appeal. It appears from the records and submissions that the original authority had imposed a penalty of Rs. 2,000/- on the appellants under Rules 9(2), 52A, 17....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ral Excise Act. Ld. Counsel for the appellants has sought to reinforce this challenge by citing following decisions of the Tribunal :- (1)     Anand Kumar Gupta v. CC, Mumbai, 2000 (120) E.L.T. 407 (T) (2)     Udai Bhaskar Rao v. CCE, Kanpur, 2002 (142) E.L.T. 414 (Tri. -Chennai). 2. Ld. DR submits that it was a fit case for enhanced penalty on....