Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2004 (10) TMI 373

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-  After examining the records and hearing both sides, I am of the view that the appeal itself requires to be finally disposed of. Accordingly, after dispensing with pre-deposit, I take up the appeal. It appears from the records and submissions that the original authority had imposed a penalty of Rs. 2,000/- on the appellants under Rules 9(2), 52A, 173Q and 226 of the Central Excise Rules, 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lants has sought to reinforce this challenge by citing following decisions of the Tribunal :- (1)     Anand Kumar Gupta v. CC, Mumbai, 2000 (120) E.L.T. 407 (T) (2)     Udai Bhaskar Rao v. CCE, Kanpur, 2002 (142) E.L.T. 414 (Tri. -Chennai). 2. Ld. DR submits that it was a fit case for enhanced penalty on the assessee. However, it is fairly conceded t....