Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (3) TMI 688

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i R.K. Chandan, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Appellant in E/2755/2000 is an assessee of Central Excise and in appeal E/2756 the trading unit of the same private limited company situated in two adjacent plots. A case of successful clandestine removal of 29.2 MT (approx) of excisable goods was made and duty of Rs. 2,04,400/- was determined on that quantity while another quantity of good....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 50,000/- was imposed on the trading unit (i.e. the very same Corporate Body as the assessee under Rule 209A. The orders were confirmed in appeal. Hence these appeals. 3. After hearing both sides, and considering the submissions made, it is found that : (a)     there is no appeal filed as regards the determination of duty of Rs. 2,04,400/- as determined as submitted....