2004 (3) TMI 688
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t. [Order]. - Appellant in E/2755/2000 is an assessee of Central Excise and in appeal E/2756 the trading unit of the same private limited company situated in two adjacent plots. A case of successful clandestine removal of 29.2 MT (approx) of excisable goods was made and duty of Rs. 2,04,400/- was determined on that quantity while another quantity of goods i.e. 4.5 MT (approx) were seized as fou....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(i.e. the very same Corporate Body as the assessee under Rule 209A. The orders were confirmed in appeal. Hence these appeals. 3. After hearing both sides, and considering the submissions made, it is found that : (a) there is no appeal filed as regards the determination of duty of Rs. 2,04,400/- as determined as submitted by learned Advocate for the appellants and he ....