Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2003 (9) TMI 667

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was called, none appeared on behalf of the respondents. In spite of the notice, on 24-7-2003, the respondents were not present. The appeal is being taken up for hearing in the absence of respondents. 2. Heard the learned JDR and perused the appeal papers. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents are engaged in the manufacture of Glass Parts for Black and White Television....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cement of inputs (b) Rs. 67,234/- on inputs used for repairs and reconditioning of glass panels and (c) Rs. 2,98,586/- used on inputs for polishing of glass panels. (ii) The CVD on (a) Replacement of inputs such as Barium Carbonate etc. amounting to Rs. 41,412/- (Rs. 34,906/- + 6,506/-) (b) Repairs and reconditioning of glass panels and (c) Polishing of glass panels amounting to Rs. 51,996/- is o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....imposed under Rule 173Q for violation of various Central Excise Rules discussed above." 4. On appeal filed by the respondents, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the order in respect of demand of duty set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 173Q on the ground that the appellants had no intention to evade duty. The Revenue filed this appeal against the impugned order where the penalty was set....