2004 (6) TMI 468

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. -  The Revenue has filed the present Appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 1151/2003, dated 25-11-2003 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the Adjudication order relying upon the decision in the case of Beauty Dyers v. Union of India [2004 (166) E.L.T. 27 (Mad.) = 2002 (52) RLT 636 (Madras)]. 2. Shri Virag Gupta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ril, 1998 to June, 1998, the respondents had paid the total duty amounting to Rs. 3,32,255/- instead of Rs. 3,90,567/- payable by them; that the Deputy Commissioner under Order-in-Original No. 237/2003, dated 24-2-2003 confirmed the demand and imposed equal amount of penalty; that the Commissioner (Appeals) under the impugned order has set aside the impugned order relying upon the decision in the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dated 8-4-2002 [2002 (145) E.L.T. 290 (T. - LB)]. 3. Opposing the Appeal, Shri R. Santhanam, learned Advocate submitted that the respondents have paid the duty correctly and no differential duty is demandable from them. 4. We have considered the submissions of both the sides. In Beauty Dyers case, the Rules for consideration of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras was Hot Air Stenter Indep....