Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (3) TMI 652

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gar, DR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  Penalties of Rs. 10,000/- each have been imposed on the appellants in respect of three different periods. These penalties are under Section 117 of the Customs Act and are based on the ground of short-payment of Merchant Overtime (MOT) charges by the parties. It appears from the records and the submissions that the appellants availed supervisory a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... quasi-judicial jurisdiction. The appellants have challenged this dichotomy writ large on the impugned order. This challenge is prima facie sustainable. If any demand of establishment/supervision charges under the Customs (Fees for Rendering of Services by Customs Officers) Regulations, 1998 is administrative and not quasi-judicial, then the question whether any penalty is liable to be imposed on ....