2003 (10) TMI 558

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Appellant. Ms. Charul Barnwal, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. -  In this appeal, filed by M/s. Hindustan Processors Ltd., the issue involved, is whether the abatement of duty is available to them under Rule 96ZQ(7)(g) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. 2. Shri K.K. Anand, learned Advocate, submitted that the appellants are independent pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he appeal, filed by M/s. Janki Processors Ltd., has already been allowed by the Tribunal vide Final Order No. A/170/2003-NB(C), dated 2003 [2003 (156) E.L.T. 68 (T)]. 3. Countering the arguments, Ms. Charul Barnwal, learned SDR, submitted that as per the provisions of Rule 96ZQ of Central Excise Rules, 1944, 50% of the amount of the duty payable for calendar month was required to be debite....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a period of one month or more, he shall not be required to pay duty for that period in advance". It has not been disputed by the Revenue that the appellants have filed the abatement claim for the period from 23-10-2000 to 1-2-2001. The stenter was sealed on 23-10-2000 and the seal was broken on 1-2-2001. It is thus apparent that the factory was closed for a period which is more than one month. In....