1999 (7) TMI 624

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J)]. - Heard both sides with reference to the appeal filed by the assessee, M/s. LML Ltd. Shri R. Santhanam, learned Advocate appearing for the appellants submitted that the main issue to be considered in this case is whether notional interest on deposit is to be included in the assessable value. He submitted that interest in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....SDR submitted that the Commissioner has relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Metal Box India Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise [1995 (75) E.L.T. 449 (S.C.) = 1995 (56) ECR 625]. He submitted that in view of the conflicting views of the Apex Court in the case of Metal Box India Ltd., as well as the VST Industries, the matter may be remanded to the adjudicating authority fo....