Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2004 (6) TMI 424

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....demption fine of Rs. 50,000/- in respect of goods valued at Rs. 85,305.10 seized from the godown of appellant. (iii) Imposition of redemption fine of Rs. 3,00,000/- in respect of manmade fabrics admeasuring 54,990 L. Metres valued at Rs. 7,80,797/- and cotton fabrics admeasuring 42,398 L. Metres valued at Rs. 7,03,476/-, which were seized from appellant's premises on account of their not being entered in the RG1 register. (iv) Demand for duty of Rs. 52,73,773/- in respect of processed manmade fabrics allegedly cleared in the guise of cotton fabrics by claiming exemption in terms of Notification No. 253/82-C.E., dated 8-11-1982. (v) Penalty of Rs. 10.00 lakhs on the assessee, Rs. 1.00 lakh on the Director, Rs. 25,000/- on P.M. Gohil, godo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....,000/- on 54,990 L. Metres of man-made fabrics and 42,398 L. Metres of cotton fabrics which were seized within the factory premises on account of not being entered in the RG1 register, it was submitted that it was an admitted position that the stock in question was in process and that it had not reached the RG1 stage. Appellant submits that this fact is evident from Para 3 of the impugned Order-in-Original. Appellant also submitted that even otherwise the goods in question as well as those at Sr. No. 2 above cannot be held liable for confiscation under Rule 173Q(b) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 as the same can in fact be invoked only if there is mens rea on the part of the assessee and the absence of the same goods cannot be held liable....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tor and two employees to the effect that the description given in the Gray Inward Register was correct. (iii) Statements given by 3 persons who supplied gray fabric to the appellant wherein they stated that, based on the prices shown in the grey invoices, they were able to confirm the correctness of the description given in the Gray Inward Register. 6. Examining the material, it is found : (a) The Gray Inward Register is maintained mainly for recording the quantity of such fabric received, the number of bales made, quantity returned without processing and the quantity transferred to the processing unit. Column No. 5 which is titled 'quantity' was not really material for the storekeeper and, in any case, the storekeeper is not techni....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... case that the Gray Inward Register mentioned the correct description of the quality now proved to be incorrect, consequently the same could not be relied upon. (c) The statements of the Director and employees were recorded under duress and affidavits of retraction were placed before the adjudicator wherein a handwritten document containing corrections made by an investigating officer was also annexed. There is no discussion in the order on this very relevant aspect. This handwritten annexure goes to prove that the statements were not only not true but were dictated by the officers. The statements of the suppliers are also rendered unreliable in view of the testimonies of two of the suppliers who, in the course of cross-examination, have r....