2004 (2) TMI 427

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....[Order]. - In this appeal the appellants have challenged the validity of the impugned order-in-original vide which penalty of Rs. 10,000/- under Rule 173Q has been imposed while rejecting the prayer of the appellants for paying the duty under the compounded levy scheme. 2. The learned Counsel has contended that even if the appellants are taken to be not entitled to the benefit of Notificat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... independent Textile Processors, engaged in the manufacture of specified processed textile fabrics. They also paid the duty under the said Scheme as detailed by them in the reply to the show cause notice. They even alleged that they had paid excess duty and claimed refund of Rs. 6,37,593.88 as detailed by them in the annexure C, to their reply. But the Commissioner has not at all considered this p....