Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2003 (12) TMI 449

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... : Shri K.A. Mishra, SDR, for the Appellant. Shri L.P. Asthana, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - M/s. Marvel Vinyls Ltd. are engaged in the manufacture of PVC sheets. The item is liable to Central Excise Duty on ad valorem basis. 2. The issue raised in these appeals is whether the appellants failed to enter full quantity of products in the books of a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gly, show cause notice was issued alleging that the appellant was guilty of clearing more goods than had been accounted for and this involved evasion of Central Excise Duty. The duty was confirmed under Order-in-Original No. 76/CEX/DFM/DC/2000, dated 25-2-2000 by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise. He also confiscated goods which had been seized and imposed a penalty on the appellant. The a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ioner, Indore is in appeal before us against that order, holding that, order is not proper and legal. On the same issue, duty demand was confirmed on the assessee by the Commissioner, Central Excise, Indore vide his Order No. 96/2001, dated 24-12-2001. The assessee is in appeal against that order. Certain officers of the assessee have also filed appeals against penalties imposed on them under that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the length charged for did not take in the quantity provided towards shrinkage. Learned Counsel also emphasized that, in any event, there was no short-levy of duty inasmuch as the appellants had discharged ad valorem duty on the total payments received on the sale of the goods. It is his contention that the entire proceeding is the result of a misconception. 4. We find merit in the contentio....