Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2003 (8) TMI 437

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri Virag Gupta, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. -  In this appeal which has been filed by the appellants, the issue relates to the availability of the benefit of the Notifications No. 8/97, dated 1-3-97 and 55/91-C.E. to the appellants. The adjudicating authority, however, allowed the benefit of these Notifications to the appellants in respect of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....msp;However, the learned Counsel has prayed for setting aside the penalty of Rs. 15,000/- confirmed against the appellants through the impugned order of the Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground that the adjudicating authority decided the issue in favour of the appellants and earlier the Board's Circular was also in favour of the appellants allowing the benefit of the Notifications in question, but....