2004 (1) TMI 431

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i K.K. Srivastava, DR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Appeal No. E/1141/03 is filed by Revenue and E/1349/03 by the assessee against the very same order-in-appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals). These appeals are being disposed off by this common order. 2. The Commissioner (Appeals) found :- "As discussed in forgoing pages on merits also the case of the appellants does not stand an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The question that arose was the amounts of reversal required to be made on goods exported after execution of Bond B-13 and exported by showing a duty of 16% on goods exported whereas the goods were exempted unconditionally under Notification No 5/99-Central Excise. (b)        The lower authorities had ordered the recovery of 8% of amount of value amounting to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rder without determining the quantum waived cannot be upheld. The assessee never got a chance to comply with pre-deposit. The order is therefore bad being an order Hurried. Justice Hurried is Justice Burried. (f)         On merits it is found that goods exported under bond cannot be goods exempt from duty has been finally settled by the S.C. vide decision....