Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1997 (10) TMI 366

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....L. Bhat, President]. -  Respondent is absent but has sent a request for decision of the appeal on merits. Respondent has also filed a cross-objection supporting the order impugned in the appeal. We have heard Shri M. Ali, JDR and perused the papers. 2. Respondent manufactures aluminium products governed by the erstwhile T.I. 27. The dispute in the appeal relates to the period January, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot supported by any authorisation in terms of Section 35B(2) of the Central Excise Act and authorisation, if any, is general authorisation issued by Collector of Central Excise, which should not be adequate in law. Copy of the authorisation issued by the Collector of Central Excise is before us. It does authorise Assistant Collector to file an appeal against the order impugned in this appeal. This....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce the percentage of goods subjected to such process was small and factory gate price was available. He also relied on the circumstance that process was carried out outside the respondent's premises and after clearance from the factory on payment of duty. 5. The view taken by the Collector (Appeals) does not appear to be sound. There is no dispute that buyer wanted isomerised aluminium tube....