2003 (9) TMI 571
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Hemant Kothikar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C. Satapathy, Member (T)]. - We have before us an application for Rectification of Mistake (ROM-730/01) and a Miscellaneous Application (915/01) in respect of Tribunal's Order No. 3039/WZB/1998/C-I, dated 17-7-1998 passed in Appeal No. E/509/93-Bom. We also have before us fresh appeals and stay ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....error in recording that the respondents are liable to pay duty of Rs. 86,737.05/-. It is seen from Annexure B to the impugned Show Cause Notice that the total demand was to the extent of Rs. 86,737.05/- which comprised of four different items. The appellants raise no dispute regarding their liability to pay duties of Rs. 15,800/- and Rs. 1052.10 in respect of the first and second Sr. Nos. in the s....
TaxTMI